Edit Survey: Peers

Back to Surveys
Demo read-only mode: survey content is visible but editing and question changes are disabled.
Strategic Direction
Contributes strategic perspective and cross-functional thinking to peer relationships.
Strategic Thinking
Future Orientation
Q1
Brings a long-term perspective to cross-functional discussions.
Analysis
Factor: Strategic Contribution
High score: Valued for strategic input in peer settings
Low score: Focused only on own domain
Q2
Anticipates how changes in their area will affect mine.
Analysis
Factor: Cross-Impact Awareness
High score: Proactively manages interdependencies
Low score: Creates surprises for peer teams
Q3
Proactively raises potential issues before they become problems.
Analysis
Factor: Proactive Escalation
High score: Early warning behavior reduces risk
Low score: Waits until issues are critical
Q4
Contributes to organization-wide strategy, not just their own area.
Analysis
Factor: Enterprise Thinking
High score: Thinks beyond own function
Low score: Narrowly focused on own team
Systems Thinking
Q1
Understands and respects the constraints and pressures I face.
Analysis
Factor: Empathetic Systems View
High score: Builds cooperative relationships
Low score: Dismissive of others' challenges
Q2
Thinks about how their decisions affect other teams.
Analysis
Factor: Impact Awareness
High score: Considerate of downstream effects
Low score: Actions create unintended consequences for peers
Q3
Seeks to understand the bigger picture before acting.
Analysis
Factor: Contextual Thinking
High score: Thoughtful and considered approach
Low score: Acts without full context
Q4
Helps connect ideas and people across different parts of the organization.
Analysis
Factor: Connector Behavior
High score: Network connector who adds value
Low score: Operates in isolation
External Awareness
Q1
Shares relevant external insights that benefit colleagues.
Analysis
Factor: Knowledge Sharing
High score: Generous with useful information
Low score: Hoards information
Q2
Brings customer or market perspectives to internal discussions.
Analysis
Factor: External Orientation
High score: Grounds discussions in reality
Low score: Internally focused
Q3
Stays informed about broader trends that could affect the organization.
Analysis
Factor: Environmental Scanning
High score: Well-informed peer
Low score: Limited awareness beyond own scope
Q4
Adapts quickly when external conditions change.
Analysis
Factor: External Adaptability
High score: Resilient and responsive
Low score: Slow to react to change
Decision Quality
Analytical Rigor
Q1
Brings well-reasoned arguments to discussions.
Analysis
Factor: Argumentative Quality
High score: Respected for quality of thinking
Low score: Arguments are weak or unsupported
Q2
Considers multiple perspectives before reaching conclusions.
Analysis
Factor: Perspective-Taking
High score: Balanced and fair thinker
Low score: Single-minded in viewpoint
Q3
Separates facts from opinions in discussions.
Analysis
Factor: Factual Discipline
High score: Clear, fact-based contributor
Low score: Mixes opinion with fact
Q4
Is willing to be persuaded by a better argument.
Analysis
Factor: Intellectual Openness
High score: Open-minded and flexible
Low score: Rigid and defensive of own position
Judgment Under Uncertainty
Q1
Makes good decisions even without perfect information.
Analysis
Factor: Ambiguity Tolerance
High score: Comfortable with imperfect data
Low score: Paralyzed by lack of certainty
Q2
Balances thoroughness with the need to act.
Analysis
Factor: Action Orientation
High score: Practical and decisive
Low score: Over-analyzes or rushes
Q3
Owns the consequences of their decisions, good or bad.
Analysis
Factor: Outcome Ownership
High score: Takes responsibility = earns respect
Low score: Deflects blame
Q4
Consults others appropriately before making impactful decisions.
Analysis
Factor: Consultative Decision-Making
High score: Inclusive and respectful of peer input
Low score: Unilateral decisions that affect others
Accountable Choices
Q1
Follows through on commitments made to colleagues.
Analysis
Factor: Peer Reliability
High score: Dependable colleague
Low score: Breaks commitments to peers
Q2
Accepts their share of joint accountability.
Analysis
Factor: Shared Accountability
High score: Fair distribution of responsibility
Low score: Avoids shared responsibilities
Q3
Corrects course quickly when a decision isn't working.
Analysis
Factor: Adaptive Recovery
High score: Agile and responsive
Low score: Stubbornly persists with failed approaches
Q4
Communicates honestly about challenges and setbacks.
Analysis
Factor: Transparent Communication
High score: Honest about difficulties
Low score: Hides problems until they escalate
Execution Excellence
Delivers reliably and helps peers achieve shared goals.
Collaboration & Reliability
Collaborative Mindset
Q1
Actively seeks ways to support colleagues' objectives.
Analysis
Factor: Collaborative Intent
High score: Strong organizational citizenship
Low score: Focused solely on own objectives
Q2
Shares resources and information generously.
Analysis
Factor: Resource Generosity
High score: Generous team player
Low score: Resource hoarding
Q3
Works effectively across functional boundaries.
Analysis
Factor: Boundary Spanning
High score: Effective cross-functional operator
Low score: Struggles outside own domain
Q4
Approaches joint work with a genuine team-first mentality.
Analysis
Factor: Team Orientation
High score: Puts collective success first
Low score: Self-interested in collaborative settings
Performance Discipline
Q1
Delivers high-quality work consistently.
Analysis
Factor: Quality Consistency
High score: Reliable output quality
Low score: Inconsistent quality creates peer frustration
Q2
Meets deadlines that affect other people's work.
Analysis
Factor: Deadline Reliability
High score: Dependable in shared workflows
Low score: Creates bottlenecks through missed deadlines
Q3
Takes initiative to solve problems rather than waiting for others.
Analysis
Factor: Proactive Initiative
High score: Self-starter who moves things forward
Low score: Passive, waits for direction
Q4
Manages their own workload without negatively impacting others.
Analysis
Factor: Workload Management
High score: Self-managing and considerate
Low score: Poor self-management creates peer burden
Reliability
Q1
Can be counted on to deliver what they say they will.
Analysis
Factor: Trustworthiness
High score: Highly trusted peer
Low score: Trust deficits from broken promises
Q2
Communicates proactively if something will be delayed.
Analysis
Factor: Proactive Communication
High score: Early warning enables adaptation
Low score: Surprises cause frustration
Q3
Maintains consistent performance standards.
Analysis
Factor: Standard Consistency
High score: Predictable quality level
Low score: Variable performance
Q4
Takes ownership of their area without needing to be reminded.
Analysis
Factor: Self-Direction
High score: Autonomous and responsible
Low score: Needs prompting to complete responsibilities
Influence & Alignment
Influences without authority, builds productive peer relationships.
Communication & Influence
Clarity
Q1
Communicates their ideas clearly and persuasively.
Analysis
Factor: Persuasive Communication
High score: Ideas are well-articulated and compelling
Low score: Ideas lost in poor communication
Q2
Keeps relevant stakeholders informed without over-communicating.
Analysis
Factor: Communication Calibration
High score: Right amount of information to right people
Low score: Over or under-communicates
Q3
Adapts their communication style to different audiences.
Analysis
Factor: Audience Adaptation
High score: Flexible and effective communicator
Low score: One communication style regardless of audience
Q4
Is direct and honest in feedback and discussions.
Analysis
Factor: Direct Communication
High score: Trusted for honest input
Low score: Indirect or unclear feedback
Active Listening
Q1
Takes the time to understand my perspective before responding.
Analysis
Factor: Perspective-Taking
High score: Empathetic listener
Low score: Responds without understanding
Q2
Builds on others' ideas rather than dismissing them.
Analysis
Factor: Idea Building
High score: Additive thinking style
Low score: Competitive or dismissive of others' ideas
Q3
Acknowledges valid points even during disagreements.
Analysis
Factor: Acknowledgment
High score: Gracious in debate
Low score: Win-at-all-costs mentality
Q4
Shows genuine interest in understanding different viewpoints.
Analysis
Factor: Curiosity
High score: Genuinely interested in others' thinking
Low score: Dismissive of alternative viewpoints
Stakeholder Alignment
Q1
Navigates competing priorities between teams constructively.
Analysis
Factor: Priority Negotiation
High score: Effective at finding win-win solutions
Low score: Creates adversarial dynamics
Q2
Influences others through logic and persuasion, not politics.
Analysis
Factor: Ethical Influence
High score: Influence through expertise and reasoning
Low score: Uses political manipulation
Q3
Builds coalitions to drive positive outcomes.
Analysis
Factor: Coalition Building
High score: Skilled at mobilizing support
Low score: Operates alone or divisively
Q4
Maintains strong working relationships even through disagreements.
Analysis
Factor: Relationship Resilience
High score: Relationships survive conflict
Low score: Conflicts damage relationships
Character & Emotional Maturity
Demonstrates integrity and emotional intelligence in peer interactions.
Emotional Intelligence
Composure
Q1
Remains professional and calm during heated discussions.
Analysis
Factor: Discussion Temperament
High score: Stabilizing presence in groups
Low score: Escalates tensions
Q2
Doesn't let personal frustrations affect their professional behavior.
Analysis
Factor: Emotional Boundaries
High score: Maintains professionalism
Low score: Personal emotions bleed into work
Q3
Manages pressure without transferring stress to others.
Analysis
Factor: Stress Containment
High score: Absorbs rather than spreads stress
Low score: Becomes a source of peer stress
Q4
Bounces back from setbacks quickly.
Analysis
Factor: Recovery Speed
High score: Resilient and forward-focused
Low score: Dwells on setbacks
Self-Awareness
Q1
Understands their own strengths and limitations.
Analysis
Factor: Accurate Self-Assessment
High score: Realistic self-view
Low score: Overestimates or underestimates capabilities
Q2
Is open to constructive feedback from peers.
Analysis
Factor: Feedback Receptivity
High score: Growth-oriented
Low score: Defensive when challenged
Q3
Recognizes when they need help and asks for it.
Analysis
Factor: Help-Seeking
High score: Appropriately vulnerable
Low score: Over-independent or insufficiently vulnerable
Q4
Adjusts their approach based on feedback received.
Analysis
Factor: Behavioral Adjustment
High score: Demonstrates learning from feedback
Low score: Receives but doesn't act on feedback
Integrity
Q1
Behaves consistently whether or not they are being observed.
Analysis
Factor: Behavioral Consistency
High score: Authentic and consistent
Low score: Different behavior based on audience
Q2
Gives credit where it's due and doesn't take credit for others' work.
Analysis
Factor: Fair Attribution
High score: Builds trust and goodwill
Low score: Credit-taking erodes peer relationships
Q3
Respects confidential information shared by colleagues.
Analysis
Factor: Discretion
High score: Trusted with sensitive information
Low score: Gossips or breaches confidence
Q4
Maintains ethical standards even when it's inconvenient.
Analysis
Factor: Ethical Fortitude
High score: Principled even under pressure
Low score: Compromises ethics when expedient